The Black Moon-Neptune Spell Trilogy – Episode One, part 2
Where did Nazism go? And where did it come from? And where is it NOW?
We ended part 1 of this first episode of the Black Moon-Neptune Trilogy with these three pressing questions. And we do have the intention to allow more people to find out! Since the time has come for us to proceed to part 2 of this true narrative – says the White Mikhailovich Rabbit. Follow me!
1. Where Did Nazism Come From
At the core of nazism, lies eugenics and racial hygiene, having as a premise the superiority of one race over other humans – a hierarchy set by biology, in which either “White”, “Germanic”, “Nordic”, or “Aryan” is considered to be superior to other races. A human being’s intellectual, moral, and spiritual worth, their rights and status could, thus, be defined by their skin color or biological origin. Whilst eugenics aims to improve the genetic quality of human population, attempting to alter human gene pools by excluding peoples and groups judged to be inferior, or promoting those judged to be superior; racial hygiene aims for ridding a society or human population of those genes and races considered undesirable.
We dive into the astrology of eugenics and racial hygiene in Episode Three of this series. Right now, we situate its relation to the emergence of nazism in the 20th century in Europe.
Both concepts of eugenics and racial hygiene appeared in the 19th century, which saw the rise of a scientific worldview by which humans were ranked in a hierarchy according to what was considered to be their degree of biological, cultural and moral advancement – cultural and moral advancement seen as resulting from the biological advancement and superiority of some races over others. British biologist Charles Darwin’s evolution theory of natural selection played a huge part in the emerging mentality.
This evolutionary worldview was marked by much faith in human progress, but also by dread of degeneration, which humans had to prevent. Go figure – there was a “natural” selection of the best, but humans had to correct that very natural selection they now believed in, to favor what they considered should be selected as the “best race” and, in fact, get rid of those they apparently considered to have shamefully dodged natural selection.
In other words: Believe natural selection – but do it yourself.
Transitioning into the 20th century, amongst the varied secret or selective societies with a eugenicist paradigm which were formed in Europe, there was the Thule Society, a secret brotherhood to which some pioneers of German nazism were members. The ideology professed by the Thule Society was inspired by a corpus of esoteric and mystical elements drawn from the ariosophy of Guido von List, from Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels, Rudolf von Sebottendorf, Helena Blavatsky, Arthur de Gobineau, as well as the Aryan-centrist theories of some German archaeologists. Originally called the Germanenorden, the Germanic order, it had been founded by Theodor Fritsch, an outspoken antisemitic journalist and publisher, in Leipzig in March 1912, having the swastika as its insignia. And guess what? The Black Moon was aspecting Neptune at that time, by opposition (in the signs of Capricorn and Cancer, respectively).
The German Nazi Party
The founding of the Nazi Party (NSDAP) occurred in February 1920, when Adolf Hitler presented its program to two thousand people at the Hofbräuhaus beer hall in Munich. It unfolded from its embryonic form, the DAP, the German Workers’ Party, which was one of the many splinters of the then shattered German Fatherland Party (Deutsche Vaterlandspartei), which was an economically liberal right-wing party at the end of WWI. The DAP had been founded in January 1919 by Thule Society participants holding nationalist and antisemitic views, such as Anton Drexler and Karl Harrer.
Hitler was working in the army’s intelligence service in Munich, where he had been participating in the persecution of Bolsheviks, when he started to attend the small DAP meetings, on September 12, 1919. He very soon became a speaker in the meetings and, by January 1920, he co-authored the party’s program along with Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, and Reinrich Eckart. The latter had also been a member of the Thule Society, and was quite attentive to the communication skills of Hitler, instructing him on how to improve them for yet greater impact.
The party’s program, which advocated for rejecting the Treaty of Versailles, was composed by the four of them who, even though sharing clearly-expressed nationalist and anti-Semitic views, had different priorities. Gottfried was strongly opposed to the pursuit of riches. Drexler, who amongst them was the only one with a worker’s background, focused on workers’ concerns and wanted to create a right-wing alternative to the appeal of Marxism. Hitler also deplored Marxism for its belief in racial equality and its levelling egalitarianism, which would go against the principle of inequality that allowed for the domination of some individuals over others. With that in mind, the DAP – German Workers’ Party was renamed as NSDAP – National Socialist German Workers’ Party.
At that moment, the Black Moon was in Sagittarius, ruled by Jupiter in conjunction to Neptune, and she formed a Mutable square with Saturn in Virgo and Mercury (and Pallas) in Pisces. Although still on the fringes of German society, with the party’s program, the new name and the face, Hitler’s, the Nazi party was ready to grow.
Importantly, the program was neither changed nor mentioned in the later years, when the Nazis were in power – Goebbels being highly critical of it. But the views and sentiments gathered around it deserve acknowledgement if we are to understand what was cooking.
It is worth mentioning that Jews were despised both for being rich capitalists and for being egalitarian communists. Nevertheless, partnering with other Western capitalists was not a problem, as Hitler and the Nazi party received immense financial and material support from American corporations – as we will observe later in this piece. Not only that, American capitalist Henry Ford and Hitler shared an openly-stated mutual admiration – both having anti-Semitic and anti-communist views. Adolf famously had a photo of Henry on his desk, and called him a hero. An emblematic moment occurred when Henry Ford proudly received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, the highest Nazi award to a foreigner, in 1938.
For Inspiration
But the guidelines to the practice of nazism in Germany in the 20th century did not only come from European eugenics, the German nationalist and anti-Semitic secret societies, and the hatred for communists – the latter often ignored or downplayed in western narrative, despite the fact that the USSR lost more than 3 times the amount of people killed by the Nazis than the whole of Europe combined.
Those elements in Germany were unmistakably fundamental to manifest nazism under Adolf Hitler. Notwithstanding, a great inspiration to the very Nazi laws, mentioned at the opening of this series, were the Jim Crow Laws in the United States.
James Q. Whitman, professor at Yale law school and author of Hitler’s American Model, stated: “When the Nazis set out to legally disenfranchise and discriminate against Jewish citizens, they weren’t just coming up with ideas out of thin air. They closely studied the laws of another country.” According to the professor, that country was the United States: “America in the early 20th century was the leading racist jurisdiction in the world (…) Nazi lawyers, as a result, were interested in, looked very closely at, [and] were ultimately influenced by American race law.”
Whitman (2017) explains the German Nazis viewed the Jim Crow as a racist program which was easier to implement, since American Blacks were already oppressed and poor. But in Germany, by contrast, the Jews were amongst the rich and powerful, being necessary to take more severe – or rather more frontal – measures. Due to this, Nazis were also interested in how the U.S. had designated Native Americans, Filipinos and other groups as non-citizens even though they lived in US territory. These models influenced the citizenship portion of the Nuremberg Laws, which stripped Jewish Germans of their citizenship and classified them as “nationals.”
Nonetheless, a component of the Jim Crow that Nazis could bring into Germany were the anti-miscegenation laws, which prohibited interracial marriages in 30 of the 48 American states. Moreover, to set the criteria on how to tell who was Jewish and who was not, when banning Jewish and Aryan marriages, again the German Nazis took the US as their reference, observing American jurisprudence on how to classify who belonged to which race, Whitman explains. Hence, the Nazi Nuremberg racial laws drew from the United States’ operating law system.
Jim Crow Laws
The American Jim Crow Laws of racial segregation began to emerge as early as 1865, immediately following the ratification of the 13th Amendment, which had abolished slavery in the United States.
The origin of the phrase “Jim Crow” has been attributed to “Jump Jim Crow”, a song-and-dance caricature of black people performed by white actor Thomas D. Rice with his face painted black, which first surfaced in 1828 and satirised Andrew Jackson’s populist policies. As a result of the performance’s fame, “Jim Crow” by 1838 had become a pejorative expression meaning “Negro”. When southern legislatures passed laws of racial segregation against black people, at the end of the 19th century, those statutes became known as Jim Crow laws.
A now well-known ruthless racist organization of the Jim Crow era was the Ku Klux Klan, born in 1865 in Tennessee. It grew into a secret society which terrorised Black communities.
Resentments for the poverty resulting from the Great Depression were often directed towards Blacks, with a rise in lynchings, to the extent of some Black veterans returning home after WWII to meet with segregation and violence towards them in the USA.
Although less mentioned in regards to racial discrimination issues, the North of the United States was not immune to Jim Crow-like laws. Some states required Black people to own property before they could vote, schools and neighbourhoods were segregated, and some businesses displayed “Whites only” signs.
Even after World War II, suburban developments in the North and South were created with legal conditions that didn’t allow Black families. Black people often found it difficult or impossible to obtain mortgages for homes in certain “red-lined” neighbourhoods.
At the start of the 1880s, big cities in the South were not totally aligned to Jim Crow laws and Black Americans found more freedom there, with many moving to the cities.
As a reaction, Jim Crow laws spread around the country with even more force than previously. Public parks were forbidden for Black Americans to enter, and theatres, restaurants, public pools, phone booths, hospitals, restrooms, building entrances, elevators, cemeteries, waiting rooms in bus and train stations, amusement-park cashier windows, and even water fountains were segregated in various places. Marriage and cohabitation between Whites and Blacks was strictly forbidden in most Southern states. And it was not uncommon to see, at town and city limits, signs warning Black Americans that they were not welcome there.
When and how did Jim Crow Laws actually end?
The post-WWII era did see an increase in civil rights activities in the Black American community, with a focus on ensuring Black citizens were able to vote. As this ushered in the civil rights movement, it eventually resulted in the removal of Jim Crow laws. But not quite so fast.
Mind you, it took still years after the end of WWII for some basic respect to be stablished in the United States in regards to Black Americans. In 1948, President Truman ordered integration in the military; in 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in that educational segregation was unconstitutional (Brown vs. Board of Education), bringing to an end the era of “separate-but-equal” education; in 1964, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, legally ending the segregation that had been institutionalized by Jim Crow laws; and only more than two decades after WWII, in 1968, the Fair Housing Act ended discrimination in renting and selling homes.
But the inspiration given by the American law system were not the only contribution from the United States to nazism being practice in Europe in the 20th century. Material assistance – should we, perhaps, say “packages” of sorts? – was also provided.
Material Support
Nowadays, IBM’s participation is quite commonly known – the fact that it provided the technology to tabulate the Nazi census, with its chairman Thomas Watson having also received Hitler’s medal. Edwin Black’s book specifically focuses on, as the title puts it, IMB and the Holocaust.
German Chancellor Brüning wrote in his memoirs that, beginning already in 1923, Hitler received large sums of money from abroad – from where exactly is unknown, but it passed through Swiss and Swedish banks.
Bradford Snell, who spent two decades researching General Motors’ history, stated: “General Motors was far more important to the Nazi war machine than Switzerland… Switzerland was just a repository of looted funds. GM was an integral part of the German war effort. The Nazis could have invaded Poland and Russia without Switzerland. They could not have done so without GM.”
There are several books which have already been written detailing the many financial and material contributions made by American corporations to Hitler and the Nazi project being actualized in Germany in the first half of the 20th century. Researches have been presented by authors across the spectrum, the approaches ranging from merely pointing out how some American companies profited from the war; to highlighting their crucial contributions to creating the conditions for WWII; to investigating deeper into the motives, having found more then just the material motivation of profit. Eugenics happened to be strong in the USA and the ideological component did play a significant role into how nazism was supported and sponsored in different fields. Ford, DuPont’s General Motors, and Rockefeller’s Standard Oil were amongst the high-profiled enthusiastic contributors.
According to Sutton (2016), “General Motors, Ford, General Electric, DuPont and the handful of U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany were — except for the Ford Motor Company — controlled by the Wall Street elite — the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase Bank and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank.”
Opel and Ford A.G., the two largest tank producers in Nazi Germany, were subsidiaries of US companies controlled by J.P. Morgan and Ford, respectively (Yeadon and Hawkins, 2008).
Standard Oil, controlled by the Rockefeller family, developed in conjunction with I.G. Farben the hydrogenation process required to produce synthetic gasoline for the Wehrmacht; it also supplied ethyl lead and synthetic rubber. According to Sutton, Standard Oil aided the Nazi war machine over a decade and without this assistance, “the Wehrmacht could not have gone to war in 1939” (Sutton, 2016).
According to Nikolai Starikov (2014):
“In August 1934, American oil giant Standard Oil purchased 730,000 acres of land in Germany and built large oil refineries that supplied the Nazis with oil. At the same time, the United States secretly provided Germany with the most modern equipment for airplane factories, which would soon produce German aircraft. Germany received a large number of patents from American firms Pratt and Whitney, Douglas, and the Bendix Corporation, and the “Junker-87” dive-bomber was built using purely American technology. By 1941, when the second world war was in full-swing, American investment in the German economy totalled $475 million, Standard Oil invested $120 million alone, General Motors — $35 million, ITT — $30 million, and Ford — $17.5 million.”
Starikov’s book dives deep into the rabbit hole of the intertwinement between Anglo-Americans and Nazi business and how it made the bed for WWII.
The columnist Drew Pearson, when listing Sullivan and Cromwell law firm’s German clients who had contributed money to the Nazis, described John Foster Dulles (a partner in the firm along with his brother Allen) as the linchpin of “the banking circles that rescued Adolf Hitler from the financial depths and set up his Nazi party as a going concern” (Kinzer, 2013).
Originally Wall Street lawyers, the Dulles brothers moved into working as high level US officials. Amongst a few peculiar participations in the history of world wars by the two brothers, Allan Dulles was in the diplomatic delegation to Versailles, in the end of WWI, at the occasion of the treaty which defined the post war conditions, creating what revealed itself to be an economically unsustainable dynamic in Europe, bound to result in trouble.
And how strange that, despite the Treaty of Versailles having stablished Germany was not to be able to rearm, its rearmament was a few years later enabled by its business with the Anglo-Americans.
Unavoidable, at this point, is the acknowledgement of the vastly exposed material contribution that came from the United States, without which Nazi Germany could not have put into practice the horrors and devastation it did. Moreover, this very acknowledgement begs the question: to what extent can such material enablement be completely removed from ideological stances, especially when the one to provide the assistance does it not forced by precarious circumstances, but from an advantageous position of power?
As Starikov puts it: “This complex web of finance and business interconnections demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt that the US ruling class was profoundly sympathetic to Hitler and the project of National Socialism.” In fact, as we could observed above, not only profound sympathy for nazism was found in the United States’ ruling class, but it also provided practical, judiciary references and inspiration. Thus, the ingredients that resulted in the practice of nazism by Germany in the 20th century did not originate only in Europe, having the USA, its corporations and system, undeniably contributed to its occurrence.
2. Where did Nazism go after the end of WWII
It is commonly known that many Nazis escaped to Argentina and some other countries in Latin America through what became famous in the official Western narrative as the Nazi ratlines. But Nazis went by the thousands to some other countries which are rarely mentioned in the Western main-stream as having taken that many Nazis in. And, mind you, not because they fooled those governments and sneaked in, but because they were actually welcomed and brought in by the very governments of some of those places – by the thousands.
According to British historian Mark Felton, more than 8 thousand Ukrainian Nazis from the SS-Galizien division, serving under German Nazi command, migrated to the United Kingdom at the end of WWII. They were snuck in by the British government.
The scale of the influx of Nazi collaborators into Canada only became of public knowledge in the 1980s, when a comprehensive study carried out by Alti Rodal, on behalf of the federal government-appointed Deschênes Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals in Canada, uncovered records that US intelligence agents acting in Europe had actually funnelled Nazi collaborators from Eastern Europe through the Canadian immigration system using false papers. Rodal’s research revealed that large numbers of identically typed applications were received by the immigration department of Canada from one same address in West Germany. This address turned out to be a US military base.
There were many immigrants to Australia coming from the Baltics and Eastern Europe in general, especially Lithuania. Supposedly, none of them were Nazis or Nazi war criminals. Only a few tens of Nazi war criminals’ names have since then appeared in the news, portrayed as rare cases of Nazi ideology having migrated to the country. But it is quite astonishing the number of “neo-Nazis” that nowadays exist in the Melbourne region alone. One group called the National Socialist Network, as reported by 60 Minutes, had on their Telegram group more than 12 thousand followers.
According to historian Ann Beaglehole, “Despite New Zealand’s vigilance, some former Nazis were resettled in New Zealand.” Jews, however, “were considered extremely undesirable settlers in the 1930s and 1940s, whilst suspected war criminals and collaborators seem to have been able to sneak into New Zealand and live a quiet life”, she adds. historian Sheree Trotter expressed that it was difficult to explain the government’s lack of response on identified war criminals in New Zealand (Morcan, 2021).
What about the USA? Well, the plot thickens.
According to investigative reporter and Pulitzer Prize winner Eric Lichtblau, author of the book The Nazi Next Door, who investigated declassified CIA documents, “there were many, many thousands of Nazi collaborators who got visas to the United States” — even though they had been, for instance, “the head of a Nazi concentration camp, the warden at a camp, or the secret police chief in Lithuania who signed the death warrants for people”.
By his investigation, Lichtblau says there were more than a thousand Nazis who were used by US intelligence after the war by the CIA, the FBI, the military and other US intelligence agencies — both in Europe and inside the United States, in Latin America, in the Middle East (West Asia), and in Australia. Some were from Germany itself, some were in fact senior officers in the Nazi party under Hitler, but Lichtblau states many more were Nazi collaborators from neighbouring countries. He also states that about 4.000 or 5.000 Nazis were brought to live in the United States. Aaron Good, however, mentions there were possibly more than that.
Some former Nazis went on to assume very powerful positions in Western countries:
“The surviving Gestapo and SS men perfectly assimilated in the new conditions, many made political careers, became successful businessmen, famous writers, journalists and scientists. Their descendants still hold high positions in Western international structures, are elected to parliaments, and are among the top managers of large corporations” (Grigoryev, 2023).
For a more concrete understanding, let us name a few dedicated Nazis who were welcomed and incorporated into Western societies and power structures:
Werner von Braun – member of the Nazi Party and Allgemeine SS, as well as the leading figure in the development of rocket technology in Nazi Germany and later a pioneer of rocket and space technology in the United States. Widely seen in the US as either the “father of space travel”, “father of rocket science” or “father of the American lunar program”. He appeared many times on Sunday morning TV shows, brought to you by Disney.
Hubertus Strughold – Nazi doctor who experimented on conditions for astronauts to survive in space using prisoners, including children, and subjecting them to such experiments that many of them died. He not only was hired for the American space program but was highly praised. Considered the “father of space medicine”, the “Hubertus Strughold Award” was created in Texas for achievements in the field.
Kurt Kiesinger – had close ties to Nazi foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, and Franz Six (who led death squads in Eastern Europe); attended the 1957 Bilderberg conference and later became West German Chancellor (1967-1971).
Kurt Waldheim – intelligence officer in the Nazi Wehrmacht became UN Secretary General (1972–1981) and President of Austria (1986–1992).
Gustav Hilger – had worked in Nazi foreign minister von Ribbentrop’s personal secretariat; was hired as undercover for the CIA and became an advisor on East-West policy to people like George Kennan, who had been appointed, in 1947, as the inaugural Director of Policy Planning Staff – that is, the head of the State Department’s internal think tank. Hilger then lived in Washington D.C.
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands – served in the SS in the early 1930s before joining I.G. Farben, and co-founded the Bilderberg Group in 1954.
Walter Hallstein – served as First Lieutenant in the German Army and his name was proposed by the University of Frankfurt in 1944 as a potential National Socialist Leadership Officer (charged with teaching Nazi ideology to soldiers); was appointed the first president of the EEC (now EU) Commission (1958-1967).
“Wherever global governance was concerned, denazification was fundamentally irrelevant and systematically avoided.” (Hughes, 2022).
Alexandras Lileikis – head of a notorious secret service police in Vilnius, Lithuania, and a top collaborator with the Gestapo, in interrogating and imprisoning thousands of Jews, including children, which were then taken by the Gestapo to a death camp called Ponary, where they were machine-gunned. After the war, Lileikis was naturalized American and later hired by the CIA. It seems he did not get such a high-profiled position. Nonetheless, he was paid USD 7.000 a month, plus a carton of cigarettes for his services.
Adolf Heusinger – Adolf Hitler’s Chief of Staff of the Army became Inspector General of the West Germany’s Bundeswehr (1957–1961) and Chairman of the NATO Military Committee (1961–1964).
Hans Speidel – Nazi Field Marshall Erwin Rommel’s Chief of State became Commander in Chief of NATO forces in Central Europe 1957-1963.
Johannes Steinhott – famous Nazi fighter plat for the German Luftwaffe became Chairman of the Military Committee 1971-1974.
Johann von Kielmansegg – General Staff officer of Nazi Wehrmacht’s High Command became NATO Commander of Allied Forces Central Europe, 1965-1945.
Ernst Ferber – Lieutenant Coronel, of the Nazi Wehrmacht General Staff became Commander in Chief of NATO forces in Central Europe, 1973-1975.
Karl Schnell – First General Staff Officer of 7Gth Panzer Corps became Commander in Chief of NATO forces in Central Europe, 1975-1977.
Franz-Joseph Schulze – Senior Lieutenant of the Nazi Luftwaffe became Commander in Chief of NATO forces in Central Europe, 1977-1979.
Ferdinand von Senger und Etterlin – Adjutant to the Nazi Wehrmacht High Command became Commander in Chief of NATO forces in Central Europe, 1979-1983.
Reinhard Gehlen – Nazi German lieutenant-general and intelligence officer, Chief of the Wehrmacht Foreign Armies East military intelligence service on the eastern front during World War II. He was the chief Nazi spy for East Europe. As the war ended, Gehlen sided with the United States as the spymaster of the CIA-funded anti-Soviet Gehlen Organization (1946–56) and, later, became the founding president of the Federal Intelligence Service (Bundesnachrichtendienst, BND) of West Germany (1956–68). In other words, Nazi spymaster for East Europe became CIA’s spymaster for East Europe and, cozying-up back into the homely status of a German official, the Nazi spymaster became the West Germany’s spymaster.
Gehlen – and the 200 Nazi spies under him at the end of WW2 – actually joined the United States before the CIA was stablished – and, of course, before NATO was created as well, in 1949.
Mind you how so many Nazis were incorporated not only into US society but into the country’s power structure ahead of the creation of several US entities. It was in 1947 that US President Truman signed the National Security Act, restructuring the United States’ military and intelligence agencies, creating the CIA, the Joint Chiefs of staff, the National Security Council, and establishing the national security state structure of the US empire.
Mark Groubert, reflecting upon such facts, voiced: “A lot of the reasons that the Nazis were brought to the USA through Operation Paper Clip were Nazis sympathizers in the US.”
One thing which still needs to be mentioned is that Ukrainian Nazis in general got a free pass by Western allies after the WWII ended, bypassing the Nuremberg trials – Stepan Bandera included. Bandera was later assassinated in West Germany, in the 1950s (see Oliver Stone’s documentaries Ukraine on Fire and Revealing Ukraine, and Deborah Armstrong’s article on Bandera).
Talking about Bandera, the Reagan administration cooperated with Ukrainian nationalist Yaroslav Stetsko, former right-hand man of Stepan Bandera, considering him a respected and authoritative leader of the anti-communist movement.
The Red Street Journal presents CIA declassified documents mentioning Operation Belladonna (1946) and showing CIA’s involvement with Ukrainian nationalism, since de first days of the American intelligence agency.
When we consider the whereabouts of Nazis following the end of the Second World War, the 2022 voting results of the UN resolution, although astounding, do not come as such a surprise.
3. Where is Nazism Now
It seems Nazis did not go away eventually, by some spontaneous grace, from the Western power structure they joined after the war.
The Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland, for instance, not only is the granddaughter of Mikhailo Khomyak, the editor of the pro-Nazi Ukrainian newspaper Krakowskie Vesti in the years 1935 to 1945. In March 2022, Freeland posed for a photo with a banner of the UPA (the Nazi-aligned Ukrainian Insurgent Army). In the late 1980s, as a student in Edmonton, Alberta, she also worked for the aged Kubijovyc, former publisher of the Krakowskie Vesti, on his postwar “Encyclopedia of Ukraine”, devoted to whitewashing the history of Ukrainian nationalism.
Now, is nazism in Ukraine? Allow pre-2022 Western media to answer:
This compilation of images and headlines was published by the Red Street Journal in a piece which addresses the issue and its harsh reality, showing contemporary Hitler youth camps in Ukraine, see here.
Historically, “Slava Ukraini” was really an expression used by the Ukrainian nationalists, who were aligned with German Nazis and who committed horrendous atrocities. If you haven’t yet, do watch Ukraine on Fire by Oliver Stone to learn about Ukrainian nationalism.
And who is using the expression now? Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, is one to voice it passionately, just as Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Olaf Scholz and other European and American politicians.
The ruling class of Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia is literally teeming with the descendants of former Nazis, as Alexander Grigoryev alerts. Vytautas Landsbergis, chairman of the Lithuanian parliament and European deputy for almost 10 years, like his grandson Gabrielius Landsbergis, the current head of the Lithuanian Foreign Ministry, are direct descendants of Vytautas Landsbergis-Ziemkalnis, who voluntarily collaborated with the Nazis and served as Minister of Public Utilities of the pro-German Nazi government of Lithuania – “On his initiative and under direct control, in June 1941, the so-called Kaunas ghetto was created – the first concentration camp for Jews on the territory of the USSR” (Grigoryev, 2023).
And what is the story with the Poles? They team up so easily with the Ukronazis, even though having historically suffered terribly in the hands of the Nazis in WWII. Sadly, there seems to be, in Poland’s current leadership, echoes from WWI, when more than half a million ethnic Poles were part of the Wehrmacht, participating in battles and committing punitive actions.
Nations aren’t completely homogenous blocks, of course. American soldiers, for instance, did fight the Nazis in WWII in its later days, and their bravery, effort and contribution to end the war are to be acknowledged, respected and honoured. Many gave their lives in sincere commitment – about 400 thousand Americans died as they joined the fight to put an end to nazism, which killed 6 million Jews in Europe and more than 26 million Soviets. Unfortunately, not even the lives of American soldiers mattered to the American elites who so intricately participated in the makings of nazism.
And how did that happen? US soldiers, in 2012, members of Charlie Company, 1st Reconnaissance Battalion in Camp Pendleton, Afghanistan, posed in front of a flag with a logo resembling that of the Nazi SS.
Nowadays, in the 21st century, it is the White House that awards Nazi ‘prowess’. In March 2023, Amongst the recipients of White House’s international women of courage award was Yulia Paevskaya, an active member of the the Azov Battalion, which is known for bearing the German Nazi symbol of SS division. In March 2022, to escape Mariupol, Paevskaya pretended to be the mother of two children whose parents she had killed herself.
How can some countries be against the glorification of nazism, when that happens to be precisely their practice?
The glorification of Nazi leaders is practiced through the monuments praising them nowadays in Ukraine. Varied European countries are now practicing an insidious revisionism of WWII history, downplaying the significance of the Soviet army in granting victory over nazism, and overtly or subtly boycotting to celebrations of Victory Day.
In Japan, there have been attempts to rewrite history with lies attributing the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to the USSR, instead of the one and only country so far who actually used nuclear bombs against another country, namely – as well-know as this should be, now we better stress it – the United States against Japan.
As an unpleasant-sounding rhyme of history, Japan, who was supposed to not rearm, is now going for rearmament. Germany, who was also not supposed to indulge into military affairs, has already provided the historical leopard tanks to Ukraine. Although the tanks did not perform so well, how utterly sad a move by the Germans, no matter how white-washed – or Green-washed – it is by Western politicians and Western media, who fail to address the symbolic and concrete significance of such actions.
As Alexander Grigoryev (2023) acknowledges: “…judging by the development of events over the past decades, the descendants of the Nazis not only adapted well and became influential people, but preserved, moreover, they are trying to reincarnate, the ideas and ideology of their ancestors.”
Considerations
We have addressed the three pressing questions, acknowledging facts that help us situate the whereabouts of nazism – origins, after WWII, and now.
In part 3 of this first episode, which is focused on revealing what is the Black Moon-Neptune Spell and how it relates to nazism, we further elaborate on what has so far been presented. That will allow us to, in the next episodes, enter the layers of the nasty NATO and the US biolabs.
We shall have yet much tea to drink, Alice. By now, albeit, all our readers do smell the coffee.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
Armstrong, Deborah. The Snake from his Lair: The Bloody Legacy of Stepan Bandera. 2022. https://medium.com/@deborahlarmstrong/the-snake-from-his-lair-the-bloody-legacy-of-stepan-bandera-560d13734319
Black, Edwin. IBM and the Holocaust. United States: Dialog Press, 2001.
Felton, Mark. Ukrainian SS In Britain – Postwar SS-Galizien Division Refugees. June 2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB_Gs-0dhOo&t=105s
Good, Aaron. American Exception: Empire and the Deep State. New York: Skyhorse, 2022. Related lecture at Geopolitical Economy Report Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOviqBC3o-0&t=439s
Grigoryev, Alexander. The descendants of the Nazis who gained power in Europe, the USA and Canada continue the work of their ancestors, trying to destroy Russia again. 2023. https://en.topwar.ru/210624-poluchivshie-vlast-potomki-nacistov-v-evrope-ssha-i-kanade-prodolzhajut-delo-svoih-predkov-pytajas-vnov-unichtozhit-rossiju.html
Hughes, David. Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State. 2022. https://www.academia.edu/83912119/Wall_Street_the_Nazis_and_the_Crimes_of_the_Deep_State
Kershaw, Ian. Hitler, 1889-1936: Hubris. W. W. Norton & Company, 2000.
Kinzer, Stephen. The Brothers: John Foster Dulls, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War. New York: Time Books, 2013.
Lichtblau, Eric. The Nazis Next Door: How America Became A Safe Haven For Hitler’s Men. 2014. [book] Related lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP3srgksUqU and related article: https://www.npr.org/2014/11/05/361427276/how-thousands-of-nazis-were-rewarded-with-life-in-the-u-s
Morcan, Lance. New Zealand still not opening files on ‘resettled’ alleged former Nazi emigres. 2021. https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-zealand-still-not-opening-files-on-resettled-alleged-former-nazi-emigres/
Marrus, Michael R. Holocaust in History. Boston: Brandeis University Press, 1987.
Pool, James. Who Financed Hitler: the secret funding of Hitler’s rise to power, 1919-1933. New York: Gallery Books, 1997.
Starikov, Nikolay. (2014). Who set Hitler against Stalin? St. Petersburg: Piter, 2015.
Stone, Oliver; Lopatonok, Igor; Stein, Claire. Ukraine of Fire. 2016: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKcmNGvaDUs
Stone, Oliver; Lopatonok, Igor; Tomilova, Vera. Revealing Ukraine. 2019: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhu3lfgHhCI&t=2427s
Sutton, Antony C. Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. San Pedro: Publisher GSG & Associates Pub, 1976.
Whitman, James Q. Hitler’s American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Yeadon, Glen & Hawkins, John. The Nazi Hydra in America. 2008. https://archive.org/details/pdfy-kRjTPUdAxESumEWq/page/n509/mode/2up
http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/newspapers/WKT/1928/03/15/3/Ar00305.html
https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/bcp-pco/CP32-52-1986-1-eng.pdf
https://www.history.com/news/how-the-nazis-were-inspired-by-jim-crow
https://knowgenetics.org/history-of-eugenics/
https://www.thehistoryreader.com/historical-figures/hitlers-american-friends-henry-ford-and-nazism/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/americans-who-funded-hitler-nazis-german-economic-miracle-eger
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm
https://www.redstreetjournal.com/p/nazis
https://www.rt.com/russia/572668-nazi-celebration-white-house/
www.state.gov/2023-international-women-of-courage-award-recipients-announced
EPISODE 1, PART 1: Black Moon-Neptune and the Glorification of Nazism
EPISODE 1, PART 3: The Black Moon – Neptune Spell
